Here lately I've been reading through the book of Romans (NKJV).
Last night I read Romans 10:1-12.
1: Brethren, My hearts desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
2: For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge .
3: For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
4: for Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believes.
5: For Moses described the righteousness which is of the law. That the man which does those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaks on this wise. Say not in your heart.
Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:).
7: Or who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead).
8: But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in your mouth, and in your heart: That is, the word of faith, which we preach:
9: That if thou shalt confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and shall believe in your heart that God has raised him from the dead, thou shall be saved.
10: For with the heart man believes unto righteousness: and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11: For the scripture saith. Whosoever believes on him shall not be ashamed.
12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek:
for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
I love the part where it says in verse 12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
In other words, God doesn't care if your black or tan or white or small or tall, God loves you as you are.
Just the other day we (me, my Mom, Dad and my brother Garrett) watched the movie God's not dead, after we watched the movie, we looked up the M- Theory (or the Fuzzball-Theory). Here is what Wikipedia had to say.
In the early years of the 20th century, the atom – long believed to be the smallest building-block of matter – was proven to consist of even smaller components called protons, neutrons and electrons, which are known as subatomic particles. Beginning in the 1960s, other subatomic particles were discovered. In the 1970s, it was discovered that protons and neutrons (and other hadrons) are themselves made up of smaller particles called quarks. Quantum theory is the set of rules that describes the interactions of these particles.
In the 1980s, a new mathematical model of theoretical physics called string theory emerged. It showed how all the particles, and all of the forms of energy in the Universe, could be constructed by hypothetical one-dimensional "strings", infinitesimal building-blocks that have only the dimension of length, but not height nor width. Further, string theory suggested that the Universe is made up of multiple dimensions. Height, width, and length constitute three-dimensional space, and time gives a total of four observable dimensions; however, string theories supported the possibility of ten dimensions – the remaining six of which we cannot detect directly. This was later increased to 11 dimensions based on various interpretations of the 10-dimensional theory that led to five partial theories as described below. Supergravity theory also played a significant part in establishing the necessity of the 11th dimension.
These "strings" vibrate in multiple dimensions, and depending on how they vibrate, they might be seen in three-dimensional space as matter, light, or gravity. It is the vibration of the string which determines whether it appears to be matter or energy, and every form of matter or energy is the result of the vibration of strings.
String theory, as mentioned above, ran into a problem: another version of the equations was discovered, then another, and then another. Eventually, there were five major string theories. The main differences between each theory were principally the number of dimensions in which the strings developed, and their characteristics (some were open loops, some were closed loops, etc.). Furthermore, all these theories appeared to be correct. Scientists were not comfortable with five seemingly contradictory sets of equations to describe the same thing.
In 1994, Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced Study and other researchers suggested that the five different versions of string theory might be describing the same thing seen from different perspectives. They proposed a unifying theory called "M-theory", in which the "M" is not specifically defined, but is generally understood to stand for "membrane". The words "matrix", "master", "mother", "monster", "mystery", "magic" have also been claimed. M-theory brought all of the string theories together. It did this by asserting that strings are really one-dimensional slices of a two-dimensional membrane vibrating in 11-dimensional space.
Status[edit]M-theory is not complete, but the underlying structure of the mathematics has been established and is in agreement with all the string theories. Furthermore, it has passed many tests of internal mathematical consistency.
Some cosmologists are drawn to M-theory because of its mathematical elegance and relative simplicity. Physicist and author Michio Kaku has remarked that M-theory may present us with a "Theory of Everything" which is so concise that its underlying formula would fit on a T-shirt.[1] Stephen Hawking originally believed that M-theory may be the ultimate theory but later suggested that the search for understanding of mathematics and physics will never be complete.[2] However, Hawking later changed his mind and stated, "M-theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the universe."[3]
Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, in the popular-science book The Grand Design, take a philosophical position to support a view of the Universe as a multiverse, and define it in the book as model-dependent realism which along with a sum-over-histories approach (see Path integral formulation of Quantum mechanics) to the Universe as a whole, is used to claim that M-theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the Universe.
Here is my argument:
#1: If there is such a thing as making light, gravity and matter, then why don't, when I play guitar my fingers don't feel heavier when I play or why don't there be any light?
#2: When you go to a concert, sense there is a LOT of vibration, why don't we fall down because of the gravity that it crates or why aren't we blinded by light that it crated? Or even a little heavier.
To be continued..........
Last night I read Romans 10:1-12.
1: Brethren, My hearts desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
2: For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge .
3: For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.
4: for Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believes.
5: For Moses described the righteousness which is of the law. That the man which does those things shall live by them.
6: But the righteousness which is of faith speaks on this wise. Say not in your heart.
Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:).
7: Or who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead).
8: But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in your mouth, and in your heart: That is, the word of faith, which we preach:
9: That if thou shalt confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus, and shall believe in your heart that God has raised him from the dead, thou shall be saved.
10: For with the heart man believes unto righteousness: and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
11: For the scripture saith. Whosoever believes on him shall not be ashamed.
12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek:
for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
I love the part where it says in verse 12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
In other words, God doesn't care if your black or tan or white or small or tall, God loves you as you are.
Just the other day we (me, my Mom, Dad and my brother Garrett) watched the movie God's not dead, after we watched the movie, we looked up the M- Theory (or the Fuzzball-Theory). Here is what Wikipedia had to say.
In the early years of the 20th century, the atom – long believed to be the smallest building-block of matter – was proven to consist of even smaller components called protons, neutrons and electrons, which are known as subatomic particles. Beginning in the 1960s, other subatomic particles were discovered. In the 1970s, it was discovered that protons and neutrons (and other hadrons) are themselves made up of smaller particles called quarks. Quantum theory is the set of rules that describes the interactions of these particles.
In the 1980s, a new mathematical model of theoretical physics called string theory emerged. It showed how all the particles, and all of the forms of energy in the Universe, could be constructed by hypothetical one-dimensional "strings", infinitesimal building-blocks that have only the dimension of length, but not height nor width. Further, string theory suggested that the Universe is made up of multiple dimensions. Height, width, and length constitute three-dimensional space, and time gives a total of four observable dimensions; however, string theories supported the possibility of ten dimensions – the remaining six of which we cannot detect directly. This was later increased to 11 dimensions based on various interpretations of the 10-dimensional theory that led to five partial theories as described below. Supergravity theory also played a significant part in establishing the necessity of the 11th dimension.
These "strings" vibrate in multiple dimensions, and depending on how they vibrate, they might be seen in three-dimensional space as matter, light, or gravity. It is the vibration of the string which determines whether it appears to be matter or energy, and every form of matter or energy is the result of the vibration of strings.
String theory, as mentioned above, ran into a problem: another version of the equations was discovered, then another, and then another. Eventually, there were five major string theories. The main differences between each theory were principally the number of dimensions in which the strings developed, and their characteristics (some were open loops, some were closed loops, etc.). Furthermore, all these theories appeared to be correct. Scientists were not comfortable with five seemingly contradictory sets of equations to describe the same thing.
In 1994, Edward Witten of the Institute for Advanced Study and other researchers suggested that the five different versions of string theory might be describing the same thing seen from different perspectives. They proposed a unifying theory called "M-theory", in which the "M" is not specifically defined, but is generally understood to stand for "membrane". The words "matrix", "master", "mother", "monster", "mystery", "magic" have also been claimed. M-theory brought all of the string theories together. It did this by asserting that strings are really one-dimensional slices of a two-dimensional membrane vibrating in 11-dimensional space.
Status[edit]M-theory is not complete, but the underlying structure of the mathematics has been established and is in agreement with all the string theories. Furthermore, it has passed many tests of internal mathematical consistency.
Some cosmologists are drawn to M-theory because of its mathematical elegance and relative simplicity. Physicist and author Michio Kaku has remarked that M-theory may present us with a "Theory of Everything" which is so concise that its underlying formula would fit on a T-shirt.[1] Stephen Hawking originally believed that M-theory may be the ultimate theory but later suggested that the search for understanding of mathematics and physics will never be complete.[2] However, Hawking later changed his mind and stated, "M-theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the universe."[3]
Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, in the popular-science book The Grand Design, take a philosophical position to support a view of the Universe as a multiverse, and define it in the book as model-dependent realism which along with a sum-over-histories approach (see Path integral formulation of Quantum mechanics) to the Universe as a whole, is used to claim that M-theory is the only candidate for a complete theory of the Universe.
Here is my argument:
#1: If there is such a thing as making light, gravity and matter, then why don't, when I play guitar my fingers don't feel heavier when I play or why don't there be any light?
#2: When you go to a concert, sense there is a LOT of vibration, why don't we fall down because of the gravity that it crates or why aren't we blinded by light that it crated? Or even a little heavier.
To be continued..........